|
Send these postcards to the Government
They can be
ordered free from the Voices office voices@voiceuk.org.
STOP KILLING IRAQIS
 |
Clockwise
from left: Mustafa Adnan (2) lost a leg when his house in
Fallujah was shlled during the US attack on the city; young
child injured in a US airstrike; Iraqi woman and her 16-month
son, wounded during US bombing raid on Fallujah; Salah Falah
(7) - his father was killed and his father was killed and
his brother seriously injured during the US assault on Fallujah
(images from AP, Reuters and Getty Images, November 2004) |
Dear Prime
Minister,
According to a high-ranking Red Cross official, “at least
800 civilians” were killed during November’s attack
on Fallujah (Inter Press Service, 16 Nov). US forces also appear
to have committed serious war crimes during the assault: the city
was placed ‘under a strict night-time shoot-to-kill curfew’
(Times, 12 Nov); male refugees were prevented from leaving the
combat zone (AP, 13 Nov); and US forces were filmed killing an
unarmed, wounded Iraqi (Guardian, 16 Nov). Refugees reported that
the US dropped cluster bombs and used phosphorus weapons that
caused severe burns (IPS, 16 Nov).
A recent survey conducted
by a team of public health researchers concluded that, ‘about
100,000 excess deaths, or more have happened since the 2003 invasion
of Iraq. Violence accounted for most of the excess deaths and
airstrikes from coalition forces accounted for most violent deaths’
(Lancet online, 29 October). The same survey also found that ‘[m]ost
individuals reportedly killed by coalition forces were women and
children.’
This
carnage must stop. I demand that US and British forces stop killing
Iraqis and end their military occupation of Iraq.
SUPPORT THE TROOPS,
GRANT THEM ASYLUM
 |
Left
to right: Brandon Hughey (18); David Sanders (20) and Jeremy
Hinzman (25)
|
To: The Canadian
High Commissioner
Mel Cappe
1 Grosvenor Square
London W1K 4AB
Dear High
Commissioner,
Three US soldiers – Jeremy Hinzman (25),
Brandon Hughey (18) and David Sanders (20) – are currently
in Canada claiming asylum. They have refused to take part in the
invasion and occupation of Iraq - an invasion that has been called
“illegal” by the UN Secretary-General (BBC, 16 Sept
‘04) and which has led to the deaths of tens of thousands
of Iraqis. If they are returned to the US, they face lengthy periods
of incarceration.
During the
period 1965-1973 more than 50,000 draft-age Americans made their
way to Canada, refusing to participate in another immoral war
in Vietnam. At the time, Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau said: "Those
who make the conscientious judgment that they must not participate
in this war... have my complete sympathy, and indeed our political
approach has been to give them access to Canada. Canada should
be a refuge from militarism."
Canada must not punish US war objectors for exercising
their conscience and refusing to fight. Nor should it facilitate
their persecution by returning them to the US. I call on the Canadian
government to demonstrate its commitment to international law
and basic human decency by making provision for US war objectors
to have sanctuary in Canada.
Dear Prime Minister,
 |
Clockwise from top left: Hosam Adnan, injured
in a US attack on Sadr City, 23 Sept '04; an Iraqi civilian
covers the body of his neighbour, killed in the crossfire
during the US assault on Najaf, 12 Aug. '04; Nura (3), wounded
during the US assault on Fallujah, is rushed to a public
clinic by her father, 8 April '04; young girl, name unknown,
injured during US airstrikes on Fallujah, 28 August '04. |
In
April US forces laid siege to the Iraqi town of Fallujah. In
one week more than 600 were killed - 'the vast majority of
the dead were women, children and the elderly' according to
local doctors (Guardian, 12 April). Warplanes, fighter bombers
and helicopter gunships were all used to attack the city (New
York Times, 30 April). Ambulances were shot at and at least
one battalion was given 'orders to shoot any male of military
age on the streets after dark, armed or not' (NYT, 14 April)
In August US forces launched an assault on the city of Najaf.
Roughly 400 civilians were killed according to the Iraqi health
ministry (Independent, 9 Sept). "If we take fire from it,
we destroy the whole building," an Army commander told the
Washington Post (28 August). Meanwhile a British commanding officer
in Basra told the Observer that his Company had "fired more
rounds, killed more people and t[aken] more casualties" in
August than during the invasion (5 Sept).
On 30 Sept US forces launched a massive assault on Samarra -
the first in a new series of major offensives against Iraqi cities,
including Fallujah. The US 'cut off power and water, and American
snipers were said to be firing at anything that moved' (Independent
on Sunday, 3 Oct).
This carnage must stop. I demand that US and British forces stop
killing Iraqis and end their military occupation of Iraq.
Dear
Prime Minister,
 |
On 19
May 2004 the US military attacked the tiny Iraqi village
of Mukaradeeb, killing 42 civilians who had been attending
a wedding. More than a month later the US military - despite
over-whelming evidence to the contrary - still claimed
it had been 'a legitimate military target' (AP, 1 July) Mukaradeeb. Wood
engraving by Emily Johns. |
The US and
UK governments claim that on the 28th June they transferred ‘full
sovereignty’ to a so-called Iraqi Interim Government
(IIG), ‘ending’ the occupation. In reality:
• The
US/UK military occupation continues and the IIG has no meaningful
control over the 145,000+ US/UK forces that remain in Iraq.
• The IIG was appointed by the US and its proxies and is headed by a ‘long-term
protégé of the CIA and MI6’ (Observer, 30 May).
• The IIG’s key ministries are riddled with US advisers and it is
forbidden from reversing any of the laws – including the illegal privatisation
measures – passed by the US.
• Most power resides in the new US “embassy”, with 1700 staff
and an annual budget of $1bn (AP, 21 March).
Since the
occupation continues so will the abuses identified by Amnesty
International (March 2004): civilians shot dead, arbitrary
arrests, house demolitions and collective punishment, and the
torture and ill-treatment of detainees – a pattern of
repression that has dramatically escalated since April with
the killing, by US/UK forces, of thousands of Iraqis, including
hundreds of civilians (Guardian, 12 April, Washington Post,
26 June).
I
demand that US and British forces stop killing Iraqis and
end their military occupation of Iraq.
Dear Prime Minister,

In your
speech before the US Congress in July ‘03 you stated
that ‘Any time ordinary people are given the chance to
choose, the choice is the same… The rule of law not the
rule of the secret police.’ Yet in August ‘03 the
Washington Post reported that the US had ‘begun a covert
campaign to recruit and train agents [from Saddam Hussein’s]
once-dreaded intelligence services… an instrument loathed
by most Iraqis and renowned across the Arab world for its casual
use of torture, fear, intimidation, rape and imprisonment.’
The Sunday Telegraph has since reported that the US has budgeted up to $3bn
over the next three years to fund a new secret police force for Iraq - including
former members of Saddam’s intelligence services – and which ‘the
Pentagon and CIA have told the White House… will allow America to maintain
control over the direction of the country as sovereignty [sic] is handed over
to the Iraqi people during the course of this year’ (4 Jan).
‘In Iran, the CIA helped equip and train the Iranian secret police, Savak,
whose human rights abuses against its own citizens under the shah fueled the
revolution that brought Shiite fundamentalist Ayatollah Khomeini to power’ (Washington
Post, 11 Dec). Such a development must not be permitted to recur in Iraq.
Iraq’s people must be allowed to determine their own future free
from foreign interference.
To Tony Blair
 |
Sabrin
(14), Ilaf (4) and Abbas (10) each lost a leg when a
US rocket hit their family’s pick-up truck during
the April advance on Baghdad. As of September, they had
been unable to obtain even basic prostheses (Independent
on Sunday, 7 Sept).
|
Since March
2003, an estimated 7750 Iraqi civilians have died, with a further
20,000 injured, as a result of the US/UK military invasion
and occupation of Iraq (www.iraqbodycount.org). 1000 children
have been killed or injured by unexploded ordnance (UNICEF,
to 17 July). Yet there appears to be no US/UK government initiative
specifically to aid the injured or relatives of the dead.
According
to The Washington Post, “US officials have made clear
to Iraqis that they do not intend to conduct a complete accounting
of war damages, nor compensate those who say the occupying
army owes them’ (31 May). A US military spokesman recently
told The Guardian that Iraqis would only be paid compensation
by the occupying forces ‘when it could be proved that
soldiers had acted wrongfully or negligently during “non-combat
activities” ’ (4 August, emphasis added).
I
demand that the US/UK pay compensation to those Iraqis who
have lost family members, houses or businesses and those
injured as a result of the US/UK invasion and occupation.
THE FOLLOWING POSTCARDS ARE NO LONGER AVAILABLE
The US and UK governments claim that on 30 June
they will hand over ‘sovereignty’ to a so-called Iraqi Interim Government
(IIG), ‘ending’ the occupation. In reality:
•
The US/UK military occupation will continue ‘indefinitely’ (Wash.
Post, 22 April) and the US will remain in control of the Iraqi
army
•
The IIG will be a selected - not elected - body with no democratic
mandate. It is not allowed to reverse any laws – including
the illegal privatisation measures - that the occupying forces
have passed
• The deadline for the first election is not until 31 Jan 2005
- if if ever materialises.
•
The US will simply be moving to an ‘embassy’, with
1700 staff and an annual budget of $1bn, where ‘most power
will reside’ (AP, 21 March)
Since the occupation will continue, so will the abuses identified
by Amnesty International (March 2004): civilians shot dead, arbitrary
arrests and indefinite detention without charge, house demolitions
and collective punishment, and the torture and ill-treatment
of detainees – a pattern that has dramatically escalated
with the killing, by US forces, of hundreds of Iraqis in Fallujah,
many of whom were civilians (Guardian, 12 April).
I demand that US and British forces stop killing Iraqis and end
their military occupation of Iraq.
Dear Mr Blair,
This Mother's Day marks a year since the US and UK launched
its war against Iraq. Although the war may be over, the mothers
of Iraq are still affected by the aftermath.
Cluster bombs: According to Human Rights Watch, 13,000 cluster
bombs were dropped during the war, often in highly populated
residential areas. With a failure rate of 5-30%, these represent
an ongoing threat to civilians, particularly children.
Depleted Uranium: US and UK forces used ammunition tipped with
depleted uranium in densely populated areas. Depleted uranium
is chemically toxic and weakly radioactive. It was used in the
1991 Gulf War and may be implicated in the large rise in cancers,
and birth defects in Southern Iraq since then.
This Mother’s
Day you can ease the suffering of Iraqi mothers by making their
country a cleaner, safer place to raise
their children. I urge you to set up an environmental programme
to identify and clean up all affected areas immediately.
[Produced
by Mothers Against the War, c/o The Eirene Centre, Clopton,
Northants, NN14 3DZ. mothersagainstwar@disarm.org.uk]
The Iraqi people want
democracy*. Why, then, do you and President Bush say that a
new interim Iraqi
government has to be chosen by an undemocratic
process? You say the government must be chosen by a parliament,
which must be
chosen by regional “caucus” meetings (by 31 May).
These “caucuses” are not to be
elected by the Iraqi people, but are to be selected by committees
set up by you and
President Bush. Anton La Guardia, Diplomatic Correspondent of
The Daily Telegraph
says, ‘The “caucus” process to select the provisional
legislature will be far from
democratic, and
could undermine the legitimacy of the interim
government.’ (26 Nov. 2003, p. 18)
The United States and Britain must end their
occupation of Iraq. As a first step, I ask you to drop this undemocratic
procedure. I urge
you to listen to the Iraqi people, and to allow them to elect
their own government.
* 90.3% of
Iraqis polled by ORI in Oct & Nov 2003 were in
favour of democracy. See here.
[Produced
by Justice not Vengeance]
To Tony
Blair

In February 2003 - before the invasion of Iraq
had even begun - the US Government 'drafted sweeping plans to
remake Iraq's economy ... based on free-market principles' (Wall
Street Journal, 1st May). These plans include 'the mass privatisation
of Iraqi industry' - including Iraq's oil sector - and 'fundamental
tax reform'. Similar 'economic restructuring' elsewhere has led
to corruption, massive job losses, poverty and gaping inequality.
US corporations
such as Bechtel and Halliburton, with close links to the Bush
administration, have already been awarded lucrative contracts
for 'postwar reconstruction' and stand to profit still further
now that the US and Britain control Iraq's oil revenues. The British
Government are now encouraging UK companies to take part.
According
to a senior US adviser to the Iraqi Ministry of Industry and Minerals,
'the privatisation of dozens of Iraqi companies is likely to begin
within the next year' (Financial Times, 8 June). Yet
it is unclear whether elections will even have taken place by
then.
The future of Iraq's economy is a matter for the Iraqi people
and not the US and British governments or US/UK corporations.
I demand that Iraq's people be allowed to determine their own
economic future - and to control their own natural resources -
free from foreign interference.
To Tony
Blair
Since the invasion of Iraq, US/UK forces have
been accused of many human rights abuses. There are, “increasing reports
of Iraqi men, women and even children being dragged from their
homes at night by American patrols, or snatched off the streets
and taken, hooded and manacled, to prison camps around the capital” (The
Times, 9/07/03). Thousands have been detained without charge,
effectively ‘disappeared’, including children as
young as eleven.
Amnesty International have reported (23/07/03):
• routine lack of access to lawyers and family for lengthy periods
- sometimes for many weeks.
•
‘cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment’, including
lack of shelter, water and sanitation facilities.
• allegations of torture, deaths in custody and unlawful killing
at demonstrations
• excessive use of force during searches, with destruction and
confiscation of property, without justification or compensation.
• lack of legal accountability, reparations or redress for abuses
suffered.
I demand that the US and British governments treat the Iraqi
people and their culture with respect, abide by international
human rights law and that all prisoners of war and civilians
held without charge are released immediately.
To Tony Blair

The people of Iraq continue to suffer - and Iraq’s children
continue to face ‘grave threats to their survival, health
and general well-being’ (UNICEF, 2 May) - as a result of
12½ years of economic sanctions, the invasion and
its aftermath.
According to Médicins Sans Frontières
(2 May) the US/UK have ‘failed to meet [their] responsibility
under international law to ensure that the health and well-being
of the Iraqi people is being provided for.’
‘Insecurity and uncertainty persists across
Iraq’ and hospitals, water plants and sewage systems –
already under severe strain and under-resourced before the war
began - ‘have been crippled by the conflict and looting.
Hospitals are overwhelmed, diarrhoea is endemic and the death
toll is mounting.’ (Joint statement by Save the Children,
Oxfam and CAFOD, May 2)
I demand that
the US and British governments fulfil their obligations under
international humanitarian law and use all the resources at their
disposal to end the current humanitarian crisis.
To Jack Straw

Saddam Hussein owes over $150bn in debts and ‘war reparations.’
Under current rules, the UN diverts 25% of Iraq’s oil revenues
to pay ‘reparations’ for the invasion of Kuwait and
the 1991 Gulf War.
The cost of rehabilitating Iraq’s essential
infrastructure – vital to restoring public health in Iraq
– has been estimated at $50 – $100 bn. Before the
US/UK invasion, Iraq’s oil exports were worth roughly $10
- 12 bn a year. Clearly it would take decades for Iraq to pay
Saddam debts and ‘reparations’, diverting critical
resources needed to rebuild Iraq.
There is no moral reason why the Iraqi people
should be forced to pay for actions taken by Saddam Hussein –
the Iran-Iraq war and the invasion of Kuwait – over which
they had no control and for which they have already suffered greatly.
I demand that
ordinary Iraqis not be forced to pay Saddam Hussein's debts and
'reparations' for the 1991 Gulf War. These debts and 'reparations'
must be cancelled. |